I just saw the Joe Mixon video on Sports
Center , and it’s also available here. I wish they would have discussed two things. First, Mixon starts to walk away
at which point the victim appears to say something to him, pushes him, and then
smacks him in the side of the head — all before he strikes her. Maybe it’s just the criminal defense lawyer
in me, but I’d like to hear a debate about what type of response, if any,
would have qualified as reasonably necessary to terminate her unlawful interference
with his person. (As an example of a self-defense statute, Wisconsin ’s is here.) Would a shove have been okay? What if the shove was forceful enough to put her on the ground but did not cause any injury? Second, according to Sports
Center , Mixon “pleaded guilty to
the charge without making an admission of guilt.” How can a person plead guilty without
admitting guilt? Isn’t that what
a no contest plea accomplishes? (This is
either bad reporting or a quirk in Oklahoma
law.) Finally, an observation. From a purely practical standpoint, there’s
a lesson here that should not be overlooked: If you don’t push and smack a person in the head, you will
dramatically decrease your odds of getting knocked out. You know, an ounce of prevention and all that.
No comments:
Post a Comment