Pay: “$25,000 paid in
monthly increments of $2,083.33.”
Benefits: None. You are an “independent contractor” and “will
not receive any Racine County
employee benefits.”
Expense reimbursement:
None. “Training, travel expenses
for training[,] and legal materials are not provided or reimbursed[.]”
term: You are
obligated for one calendar year; however, Racine
County is not similarly
obligated. You will “serve at the
pleasure of the Racine County Circuit Court judges and the appointment can be
terminated at any time, for any reason[.]”
But wait, how many and what type
of cases will you have to take for that king’s ransom of $25k per year without
benefits or even expense reimbursement?
Here comes the kicker:
Workload: Attorneys
may be assigned any type of felony
[including homicide], misdemeanor, juvenile, criminal traffic, and probate
cases and any other action as the court orders . . . It is estimated that
there will be about 70 – 80 assignments in 2015 per attorney.”
Now, a few random comments:
First, if you want to do a
thorough job and not worry about malpractice lawsuits, it is nearly impossible for
a new solo to take 80 cases in a year.
(Personally, I would never take that many cases, even with fourteen years
of practice under my belt.) But let’s say that you do take the 80 cases — you are, after all, what Paul Campos calls a special snowflake. Even if you are lucky enough not to be assigned any serious felonies, and
just five of your 80 clients want to
go to trial, and your other 75
appointments go amazingly smoothly, and
you never have to wait several hours for any of your cases to be called, your pay on a
per-hour basis could still easily be driven down to sub-fast-food-level wages (but
without the benefits). Good luck paying
for your travel, training, legal materials, malpractice insurance, bar dues,
rent, other office expenses, living expenses, and your
student loans. (It’s no wonder that so
many new JDs in Wisconsin lead
miserable, anxiety-filled lives.)
Second, while you are busy “serving at the
pleasure of the Racine County Circuit Court judges” — that’s funny, I thought we were
supposed to serve our clients — those same judges will be pulling in $128,600 plus the generous benefits (including pension) that are specifically excluded from the $25,000 compensation
deal from which you can be terminated “at any time, for any reason.”
Third, this job posting shows the
real value that we place on lawyers. This pay scheme proposed by the legal profession completely
denigrates the legal profession — or at least a significant segment of it. Worse yet, this proposal was presumably authored with input from the Racine
County judges themselves (who retain
the option of firing you “at any time, for any reason”). This demonstrates that we lawyers often don’t
watch out for our own. There is often
little professional courtesy and no legal fraternity in this business we call law.
Fourth, unfortunately, I predict
that numerous lawyers will submit their applications for this job. This posting is nothing new; it comes up
every year, and every year they probably receive more applicants than there are
openings. This says a lot about supply
and demand in the legal employment market.
Finally, do you still think you
can pull this off, new JD and soon-to-be solo practitioner? Here’s the really bad news: you probably won’t even
get the job. The posting states that the
job will be awarded based on multiple factors, including whether an attorney is
certified by the state public defender (presumably to handle serious felonies, including homicides), and has “a proven record of high quality work and
reliability.”
So go out and get some high
quality legal work experience (perhaps by working for free, as our state bar recommends),
and then apply next year. Good luck!
Wonder if advocate counsel does too good a job,while he be terminated?
ReplyDeleteGood question, Walter. I would think that there's definitely an incentive for judges to hire lawyers who are trial averse, and fire lawyers who clog up the court system. Of course, technically it's the client's call on whether to go to trial, but we both know that some lawyers are very adept at convincing their clients to take deals, regardless of whether the deal is a good one.
ReplyDeleteAs a new lawyer, I would like other highly-qualified lawyers to do my work for me while I reap the rewards. Of course, "paying" a fellow JD a "living wage" would cut into my "profits." The Wisconsin scam seems like a good way to exploit my classmates who have not yet found their place in the legal market. But is there any way I can have my colleagues pay me to do my work?
ReplyDeleteHere's how it would work:
1) Start a firm
2) Desperate JD hires me as an "independent contractor," pays me $2k+ a month to "gain legal experience."
3) Desperate JD gains said legal experience by doing work someone else paying me lots of $$$ to do.
4) If said desperate JD does good work, tell them it's nothing special; suggest they need more experience. Maybe 6 months or more.
5) $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
6) If government comes after me, use massive amounts of money to defeat them and their underpaid staff. Outsource legal work if necessary.
7) Retire.
Other than the fact that it is immoral, indecent, and inhumane, this seems to be a pretty phenomenal plan for young lawyers. And it is totally not a Ponzi scheme. Just ask my lawyers.
Thank you for highlighting the abysmal job market for attorneys, in addition to the continuing scam operation that is modern legal education. We need more attorneys to speak out. The legal education industry has financially destroyed too many lives, which sadly includes mine.
ReplyDelete