If memory serves, first-year
contract law teaches that specific, factual misrepresentations are bad and
legally actionable, whereas mere “puffery” (e.g., “We are the world’s best; hurry
and come to us before it’s too late!”) is just bad. I even remember one law school professor
wryly telling the class that daytime television ads by personal injury lawyers
were “quite unsettling.” Yet, despite this
anti-puffery attitude inside the classroom, law schools are among the biggest puffers
when it comes to selling their own services.
This idea struck me when reading
about some law schools that are still soliciting students with just a couple of
weeks before the start of classes. With
schools scrambling to fill their seats, it’s probably a buyer’s (student’s)
market. But if I were looking to enroll,
how would I choose a law school? To try
and answer this question, I peeked at a handful of law school websites to see
if any were persuasive. My little research
project focused on schools that the US News placed in the bottom half or even bottom
quarter of our nation’s 200-plus law schools.
With regard to professors, virtually
every school’s website claimed that their profs were “excellent” or “top” or “outstanding.” This seems statistically improbable to me,
the prospective student, unless the “excellent,” “top,” and “outstanding” profs
are, for some reason, passing on higher paying jobs at elite private schools
and flagship state schools. Fortunately,
though, the schools that I checked distinguished their “excellent” faculty from
the equally “excellent” faculty at their peer institutions:
School #1: our profs
are “easily accessible to students and spend many hours with them.”
School #2: our profs
are “eager to engage with you inside and outside of class” and they will be
“challenging but supportive.”
School #3: some of
our profs “will even give you their cell phone numbers or meet you for coffee,
or a round of golf.” Further, they will
be there “to counsel you, to cajole you, to challenge you.”
Okay, school #3, you had me at “coffee.” But I’m not so sure about the “cajoling”; it
almost sounds inappropriate. If my
decision were based solely on the profs, then, I’d have to go with school #2.
But legal education is more than
just the professors, right? I mean,
there’s the law library that no one uses, the invisible but often touted
“energy” that permeates the school’s atmosphere, etc. So what are schools saying about their overall educational experience?
School #4: students
will be the beneficiaries of “academic excellence.”
School #5: students
will get an “excellent legal education.”
School #6: our educational
experience is “among the nation’s best.”
This is indeed a tough one. I, as the prospective student, wonder how the
bottom-half and especially the bottom-quarter of law schools could offer a
legal education that is among “the nation’s best,” or even “excellent.” But I don’t want to be overly skeptical in
what is such an exciting time in my life.
School #6 stands out. Being among
“the nation’s best” seems better than being merely “excellent” – after all, who
or what isn’t “excellent” these days? My new choice is school #6.
But wait, educational quality is
an “input” measure, not an “output” measure!
And being convinced (despite social scientists’ warning to the contrary)
that correlation does in fact equal causation, I want to pick the school with
the most successful graduates. So what
do these low-end US News schools have to say about that?
School #7: we
produce “some of the nation’s most distinguished legal professionals.”
School #8: we will
“lead you to find your distinct place in the world,” and “allow you to make a
difference.”
School #9: our
graduates “make a difference in our community and world.”
Now my choice is easy. I really hate all of that “giving back” and
“making a difference” shtick. Would-be
law students who don’t get scholarships could be looking at $150k in debt and up
to three years of opportunity cost. So, like
LeBron James, I gotta do what’s best for me and take my talents to the place
where I can have the most success. I
want to be among “the nation’s most distinguished legal professionals.” The winner is school #7.
Now, school #7, I suspect that
you only take the cream-of-the-crop students to go with your outstanding
faculty, top-flight educational experience, and world-class outcomes. Are you sure that two weeks is enough time to
evaluate my application?
No comments:
Post a Comment