I try to remain ignorant about local politics, happenings,
goings on, news, and events of every kind.
Normally, this is easily accomplished by substituting a national
newspaper for the local rag. But despite
my modest efforts, I’ve been subjected to a lot of chatter recently about who
is going to be running for Kenosha
circuit court judge when one of the sitting judges retires. And when election time rolls around –
actually, I suspect that it’s always election time for those with a
political bent – the voters will be hearing a lot of talk about why the
candidates want the job. I can predict
that every candidate’s answer will be that he or she wants the job to “serve
the public,” or “serve the community,” or some variation of that phrase. My advice to the voters: don’t buy it. Most (if not all) candidates want the job for
the huge pay raise that comes with it.
Let’s take a look at the numbers:
$52,627 – median Wisconsin
household income
$55,117 – median Kenosha
household income
$76,875 – median Kenosha
attorney salary
$113,530 – median attorney salary nationally
Actually, the salary numbers for attorneys nationally are interesting due to the bimodal salary distribution, but that's really a story for another post. More to the point: where do Wisconsin circuit court
judges fall? For their service to the
public do they get paid the median Kenosha
household income, where, typically, more than one person holds one or
more jobs each? Or do they get
the median Kenosha attorney
salary? That would seem a little bit too
high, as the would-be jurists claim to be driven by their desire to do good,
not rake in money. And surely, there’s
no way these selfless candidates are gunning for a salary as high as the national
median for attorneys, is there? After
all, this national number includes partners who work 60 or 70 hours per week at
mega firms in New York , Chicago ,
and LA. “Public service” couldn’t
possible pay that much, could it?
Yes, it could, and then some:
$128,600 – Wisconsin circuit court judge salary
And don’t forget about the taxpayer-funded pension,
health insurance, paid vacation, flexible hours, and all of the other benefits. Public service, indeed.
I don’t begrudge anyone their salary, even when it seems to
be immune to market forces (as is the case here), and even when market forces
drive it to unfathomable heights (as is the case with some athletes –
though there is evidence that one of the highest earners, Lebron James, is in some strange way grossly underpaid). But, as a lawyer, I would much rather the
candidates impress me with their legal knowledge and tell me exactly why they’d be good at the job, instead of trying to
convince me of their altruistic motives for seeking the job. Hopefully, when election time rolls around,
the voters will want the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment