Friday, March 16, 2012
The Legal Watchdog is going on a brief hiatus. I have a lot of editing and proofing to do on my forthcoming book, Tried and Convicted (Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.), and a lot of preparing to do for an upcoming jury trial. During the hiatus, Knightly (pictured) will rest and gather his strength for The Dog’s next post, which is expected early to mid-April. In the meantime, you can read some advance praise for Tried and Convicted, which is due out this summer, after the jump.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
|Ring Out Ahoya!|
Welcome, once again, to the most wonderful time of the year! The NCAA tournament is the greatest sporting event in the world. Heroes will be born. Hearts will break. Cinderellas will rise. Giants will fall. And Bill Raftery will, at some point, say “Lingerie on the deck!” “Square the puppies!” and “A little nylon!” (And his able partner-in-crime, Verne Lundquist, will laugh heartily.) Meanwhile, Knightly (left) celebrates
’s 3-seed and picks the Final Four: Marquette
(South). The question isn’t whether Kentucky will get to the Final Four again, but rather, will the appearance later be vacated? His two previous Final Four appearances (with U-Mass and Coach Cal ) have been wiped from the books due to later-discovered NCAA violations, though he, personally, was not “directly implicated in anything.” Memphis
State (East). After knocking off both Duke and Florida , the ACC tournament champion Seminoles (and their ACC coach of the year Leonard Hamilton) are a tough out. North Carolina
( Kansas Midwest). is too erratic. The Big Twelve’s regular season champion will emerge from the North Carolina Midwest. Now all they need is a new fight song.
(West). Louisville might not even be the best team in, well, Kentucky . Slick Rick has the Cardinals' press in high gear, and Peyton Siva might be the fastest man on the planet, with or without a basketball in his hand. Kentucky
Saturday, March 3, 2012
When the police have a suspect “in custody” and they want to interrogate him, they must first read him his Miranda rights, which still include (arguably) the right to remain silent. And the test for whether a suspect is “in custody” has produced some very interesting cases. For example, assume that the police are questioning a suspect at his home, but while pointing their guns at him; is the suspect “in custody”? Or what if the police use the old bait-and-switch and “invite” a suspect to come to the police station under false pretenses, and then start interrogating him once he gets there; is the suspect “in custody” in that situation? You might be able to formulate good arguments on both sides of these coins. But, when a suspect has been formally imprisoned and put in a jail cell, and the police go to question him, surely that prisoner is “in custody” and entitled to the Miranda warning, right? Not so fast. The Supreme Court says that we have to look at whether there was "custody within custody."