I’m using a new pretrial motion, usually as part of a motion
in limine, to modify J.I. 140, Wisconsin’s
burden of proof jury instruction. This
new motion is shorter, it acknowledges SCOW’s Trammel decision, and it incorporates
the recent revelation that Wisconsin’s
pattern instructions are not authored by judges, but rather by unidentified
employees of UW. This should put to rest
the prosecutorial argument that the pattern instruction should not be modified
because it was painstakingly written by an imminent judicial committee of great legal minds.
If Wisconsin lawyers want the motion to
modify J.I. 140, go to the very bottom of my J.I. 140 page, here. It’s the last document on the page. And for more on the jury-instruction
committee fiasco, including a sample motion to modify any pattern
instruction, see the draft of my forthcoming article in the Albany L. Rev.,
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment