Check out my new article, now in print, Under the Gun: Plea Bargains and the Arbitrary Deadline, 93 Temple L. Rev. 89 (2020), which you can find here. This article addresses one of the rare situations when a prosecutor and a defense lawyer will be aligned. (You can read the abstract after the jump.) All of my articles, organized by topic, are available here. My books, including critics' reviews, are here. Enjoy!
Abstract:
Courts justify their imposition of plea deadlines under the theory of judicial economy. But in reality, arbitrary deadlines are highly inefficient and create several additional problems: they often lead to rushed, unjust plea bargains; they obstruct the defendant from entering her plea knowingly and intelligently; they are the antithesis of the case-by-case discretion the judge is obligated to exercise before rejecting a plea; and they violate the separation of powers doctrine, infringing upon the prosecutor’s discretion to resolve the State’s cases when and how the prosecutor deems appropriate.
In light of these and other problems, this Article advocates for simple legal reform: the abolition of arbitrary plea deadlines or, in the alternative, severe constraints on the trial judge’s power to impose them. The legal system, however, is often resistant to change. Therefore, this Article makes a more immediate and useful contribution: it provides a strategy for the parties to obtain the judge’s approval of their plea deal, even when that plea deal is reached after the court’s arbitrary deadline has expired.
Full article here.
No comments:
Post a Comment