tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2800555221998084403.post7200014720827301944..comments2024-03-16T23:25:49.228-07:00Comments on THE LEGAL WATCHDOG: Bases coveredMichael D. Cicchini, MBA, CPA, JDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13734180053800866578noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2800555221998084403.post-76464889141821693412017-05-22T10:02:57.072-07:002017-05-22T10:02:57.072-07:00Ha! That's the most common use for the bar ma...Ha! That's the most common use for the bar magazine here as well: seeing who got disciplined and for what. I used to use it as a "what not to do" guide, but given some of the incredibly broad ethics rules (like 1.9), now I just hope I don't end up on those pages myself! Michael D. Cicchini, MBA, CPA, JDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13734180053800866578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2800555221998084403.post-90466750364659699962017-05-22T09:49:28.527-07:002017-05-22T09:49:28.527-07:00Michael
Another home run of post on the insular il...Michael<br />Another home run of post on the insular ill-advised inanities of bar bureaucrats. The esoterica, “assistive reproductive technology & parentage law,” is not unlike the metaphysical inquiries rife among law review authors (Michael Cicchini, one of the few notable exceptions), who are always trying to ferret out the next tedious irrelevancy for a topic, along the lines of the Mohttps://lawmrh.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com