I
hate it when lawyers mindlessly jabber about "public service" or "giving back" or our alleged
duty to "serve the community," as if we have some moral obligation above that
of medical doctors, corporate managers, accountants, or truck drivers. As I’ve written here, this nonsensical blather
often comes from highly paid bureaucrats at state bar associations who are
trying to put a good face on the legal profession. And as I’ve written here, other times it comes
from judicial candidates who are vying for incredibly high paying judgeships,
but need to offer up a more palatable reason for why they want the gig. But now it’s graduation time, and the law
school industrial complex is minting thousands of new JDs. And along with the graduation ceremonies
comes commencement speakers who spew out creative new twists on this worn out public
service mantra. The most creative twist
this year goes to the Northeastern University
commencement speaker who told the graduates that their degree doesn’t really
belong to them; instead, it “belongs to our whole community.”
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Friday, May 15, 2015
Podcast: Episode 9: "I didn't do it, but I know who did"
Welcome to episode nine of The Legal Watchdog Podcast.
So you're charged with a crime and you didn't do it, but you know who did -- and you can't wait to tell the jury about it. Not so fast. In this podcast, we discuss State v. General Grant Wilson, where the court shut down the defendant's "wrong person defense," a/k/a "third party defense." We discuss how difficult it is for a defendant to introduce evidence that another party committed the crime -- after all, police and prosecutors always get the right guy -- and in the second half of the podcast we discuss my article, An Alternative to the Wrong-Person Defense.
To meet your podcast hosts, click here.
To meet your podcast hosts, click here.
Our funky, jazzy theme song ("Cold Hurt") and our cool intermission song ("Rational") were generously provided by David Pizarro. To hear more of David's music you can listen to his philosophy-psychology podcast Very Bad Wizards, or go directly to his SoundCloud page.
Finally, here is the podcast:
Finally, here is the podcast:
Friday, May 8, 2015
ABA and Wisconsin Bar combine efforts to solve lawyers’ problems (but not really)
Many
new law grads are saddled with staggering debt loads and have limited job
prospects. While six-figure debt is now commonplace,
just over half of new law grads have been able to land full-time, long-term employment
as lawyers. And, thanks to the bimodal salary distribution, most of those “lucky” new lawyers aren’t even paid enough
to make a dent in their student loans. On
the other hand, for established, practicing lawyers, things aren’t much better:
fees have been stagnant or even falling — not only in real dollars, but often
in nominal dollars as well. But don’t
worry. A grinning bureaucrat from the ABA
teamed up with the Wisconsin Bar to discuss the “great opportunities facing lawyers today.” That’s funny; I thought
we “faced” obstacles but were “presented with” opportunities. But I’m not writing this to nitpick word
choice, so let’s get to the real question: what exactly are these “great opportunities”?
Saturday, May 2, 2015
Podcast: Episode 8: Reversed and Remanded?
In today's podcast we discuss two cases, State v. Harrison, Jr., and State v. Coleman. In both cases, a child accused the defendant of sexual assault. In both cases, there was no physical evidence. In both cases, there were no eyewitnesses. In both cases, the child couldn't keep the story straight. In both cases, the defense lawyer didn't thoroughly cross-examine the child-accuser. And in both cases, the jury convicted the defendant.
But that's where the similarities end. In Harrison, the District III Court of Appeals simply dispensed with the defendant's appeal via a conclusory, four-page decision that barely discussed any of the facts or cited any law. It's probably the thinnest appellate court decision in the history of appellate court decisions. But in Coleman, the District I Court of Appeals issued a detailed and thorough twenty-page majority decision that reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. We try to figure out why these two defendants got such dramatically different treatment from the courts.
Also, there's some new stuff in the podcast. First, we have new intermission music, again courtesy of David Pizarro (see below). And second, in her ongoing effort to keep Matt in line, Amy abandons the traditional "stun belt" and instead implements the use of a "restraint chair." Listen to the podcast to see if it works.
But that's where the similarities end. In Harrison, the District III Court of Appeals simply dispensed with the defendant's appeal via a conclusory, four-page decision that barely discussed any of the facts or cited any law. It's probably the thinnest appellate court decision in the history of appellate court decisions. But in Coleman, the District I Court of Appeals issued a detailed and thorough twenty-page majority decision that reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. We try to figure out why these two defendants got such dramatically different treatment from the courts.
Also, there's some new stuff in the podcast. First, we have new intermission music, again courtesy of David Pizarro (see below). And second, in her ongoing effort to keep Matt in line, Amy abandons the traditional "stun belt" and instead implements the use of a "restraint chair." Listen to the podcast to see if it works.
To meet your podcast hosts, click here.
Our funky, jazzy theme song ("Cold Hurt") and our cool intermission song ("Redd") were generously provided by David Pizarro. To hear more of David's music you can listen to his philosophy-psychology podcast Very Bad Wizards, or go directly to his SoundCloud page.
Finally, here is the podcast:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)