Many
people — especially people at colleges and universities — have come to believe
they have a right not to be offended. The
only explanation for this oversensitivity is the complete misunderstanding of
the First Amendment. (Click here for a First Amendment primer.) This is
particularly obvious when someone claims that another person’s speech isn’t
free speech, but offensive speech. Of
course, the First Amendment protects offensive speech. And, as a practical matter, if the speech
weren’t offensive, it probably wouldn’t need constitutional protection in the
first place. The most recent incident of
this came when a college newspaper published an op-ed questioning whether the
tactics of a particular political movement were really effective. What followed after the publication of the “controversial”
essay was predictable: offense was taken; outrage was expressed; punishment was
demanded; apologies were issued; and, likely, the college newspaper has learned
not to publish any articles that express a contrarian viewpoint or question today’s politically correct stances. But how did
we become such a bunch of spineless, mealy-mouthed worms who insist that free
speech has to take a backseat to our imagined right not to be offended? Ken White at Popehat explains how this
happened in his post titled “Safe Spaces” and the Mote in America’s Eye. The post is also filled with
links to numerous other posts, essays, and related works — a must read for
anyone interested in the current state of free speech. In sum, there is a real risk that the First Amendment, at least in some settings, will soon go the way of the Fourth Amendment — so enjoy this constitutional right while it lasts. [UPDATE: Richard Dawkins on free speech on campuses, here.]
No comments:
Post a Comment