By losing 59-0 to Ohio
State , the Badgers made the
Buckeyes look so good that “the committee” leapfrogged them over TCU and into
college football’s field of four “playoff” teams. Meanwhile, both TCU and Baylor — the
so-called “co-champs” of the Big 12 — got left out of college football’s
“little dance.” In some sense this is unjust,
given that the Big 12 is a stronger conference than both the Big 10 and the
ACC. But in addition to blaming Wisconsin ,
the two Texas teams from the Big
12 can also blame their own conference.
According to ESPN, the Big 12’s bylaws state that, because
there is no conference championship game, when two teams are tied at the end of
the year their head-to-head outcome will serve as the tiebreaker. In that case, Baylor was the clear champ; they
shared an identical record with TCU, and beat the Horned Frogs when they
squared up in Waco . But the conference commissioner didn’t
declare a champion. Why he didn’t do so is
speculation, but here goes.
Ideally, the commissioner would have liked both teams to get into the playoff. But his fear was probably that crowning
Baylor (ranked sixth by the committee) as the champ could keep TCU (ranked third
by the committee) out of the four-team
playoff. So the Big 12 commissioner — in
violation of the conference bylaws? — declared the two teams to be “co-champions.” And because a team’s status as conference
champion was one thing that the committee allegedly considered, and the Big 12 couldn’t identify one, it now seems like
a bit of “just deserts” — at least for the waffling conference — that both
teams got left out.
The commissioner, of course, should have just followed the
bylaws and declared Baylor the conference champ because those were the rules — at least according to ESPN. And, in hindsight, that would also have been the best chance of
getting a Big 12 team into the playoff.
Why? Because the committee jumped
Baylor to fifth (the first team out), and dumped their previous golden boy TCU to
sixth (from third), even though TCU won their last game of the year by about 50
points.
In any case, nearly one year ago I predicted all of this chaos (though admittedly I wasn’t accurate in all of the fine points). And while I hate to agree with Lou Holtz at
the expense of the far superior college football analyst Mark May, the only
viable solution to this chaos is an eight team playoff — one that includes the
five major conference champs and three wildcards. This would allow five teams to earn their
playoff births during the regular season, as it should be. This would also limit the committee — or, possibly,
a more objective system — to selecting the three wildcards. But we’re not at that stage yet. So here are The Dog’s major bowl game
predictions, which include the three games that make up college football’s
“little dance”:
Baylor over Michigan
State in the Cotton Bowl
Zona over Boise
in the Fiesta Bowl
Bulldogs over Yellow Jackets in the Orange
Bowl
Bama over Buckeyes in the Sugar Bowl
Ducks over Noles in the Rose Bowl
Ducks over Bama in the National Championship Game
No comments:
Post a Comment