But big business and government unite in ways other than
bailouts. One way (that I briefly touched on more than a year ago) is for big retailers to sell items to poor
credit risks and then use the local prosecutor’s office to criminally prosecute
the consumers (at public expense) to collect payment for the retailers. And it now looks like prosecutors and
businesses are uniting to take this practice to a whole new level.
The new practice is essentially a partnership, if not a complete
merger, between big businesses’ debt collectors and prosecutors’ offices
all across the country. According to
this New York Times article, the way it works, in a nutshell, is this: When a
retailer accepts a check from a customer, and that check bounces, the
retailer’s debt collector uses the local prosecutor’s letterhead to
extort payment. The option given to the
customer is simple: “You bounced a check for X dollars. Pay us 4x or 5x dollars, and you won’t be
prosecuted with a crime or jailed.”
But the problem—other than the obvious one of extorting
premiums of several hundred percent over and above the bounced check—is that
this system “start[s] from the position that a crime has been committed.” In other words, people are threatened with
criminal prosecution on official government letterhead before any prosecutor
even determines if there is probable cause to believe that a crime was
committed. That is, there is no prosecutorial
review or determination as to whether the bounced check—often amounting to only
a few dollars—was the result of criminal intent, as opposed to mere oversight
or even bank error. (Not every bounced
check, after all, is a crime.)
I don’t like prosecutors blindly turning over the
considerable, life-ruining power that we’ve vested in them to profit-seeking
debt collectors to use however they see fit.
What’s next? Judges turning over
pre-signed warrants letting police enter any house they want for any reason at
all? Oh, wait. That’s already alleged to be happening.
But here’s the solution to this whole debt collector–prosecutor union. Big business has to
take responsibility for its decisions in extending credit and accepting
personal checks willy-nilly. Just as
individuals shouldn’t look to the government to give them access “to healthcare, to food, to housing, to you name it,” neither should big business look to
government to collect its debts under the threat of criminal prosecution—especially
without any initial prosecutorial determination of probable cause.
So c’mon Big Biz, practice what you preach: Take
responsibility for your own actions and decisions, and quit looking to the
government for solutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment